Faculty Publications


“Civil War Mediation and Rebel Use of Violence Against Civilians.” Journal Article

Author(s): Paulina Pospieszna and Karl DeRouen Jr.

Abstract Violence against civilians is portrayed as an antecedent of civil war, a cause, or both. Civil war creates opportune environments for planning and carrying out these acts that in turn can have detrimental effects on peace processes. Since not all civil war factions will see peace as beneficial, some actors may use violence to undermine the peace talks. The rebels may use indiscriminate violence to demonstrate their ability to exact costs on the government thus forcing the latter to […]

Read More from “Civil War Mediation and Rebel Use of Violence Against Civilians.”

“The Viability of Civil War Peace Agreements.” Journal Article

Author(s): Karl DeRouen Jr. and Marie Olson Lounsbery

Abstract Civil war peace agreements are prone to collapse. While some research suggests that multiple layers of power-sharing provisions lead to more viable agreements, others have suggested that negotiated settlements are not only more likely to return to violence, but that those cases will be more deadly as a result. We suggest here that previous research has failed to address the various ways that peace agreements emerge and that this context is crucial in explaining peace agreement viability. In some […]

Read More from “The Viability of Civil War Peace Agreements.”

“Mediation, Peacekeeping and Civil War Peace Agreements.” Journal Article

Author(s): Karl DeRouen and Ishita Chowdhury

Abstract The post-civil war agreement phase is vulnerable to credible commitment problems, a lack of government capacity to implement, and/or mutual vulnerability to retribution from violating the agreement. This study’s main contribution is to demonstrate the combined utility of mediation and UN peacekeeping. Mediation builds trust and confidence and works with the parties to design an efficacious agreement conducive to, among other features, tamping down post-agreement violence. Peacekeeping stems violence and facilitates the implementation of the agreement. Agreements that are […]

Read More from “Mediation, Peacekeeping and Civil War Peace Agreements.”

“The local mwananchi has lost trust’: design, transition and legitimacy in Kenyan election management.” Journal Article

Author(s): Nicholas Nathan Kerr and Aaron Erlich

Abstract Across African democracies, maintaining popular trust in electoral management bodies (EMBs) is vital to enhancing election integrity and, ultimately, regime legitimacy. However, scholars have largely sidestepped any systematic analysis of how citizens formulate their attitudes towards EMBs and how these attitudes vary over time. To address these gaps in the literature, we focus on Kenyan EMBs, which have experienced fluctuating popular support since the ruinous 2007 elections and subsequent institutional reforms. Using primary election reports and original survey and […]

Read More from “The local mwananchi has lost trust’: design, transition and legitimacy in Kenyan election management.”

“An Insider–Outsider Theory of Popular Tolerance for Corrupt Politicians .” Journal Article

Author(s): Nicholas Nathan Kerr and Eric Chang

Abstract This article addresses the puzzle of electoral support for corrupt politicians in emerging democracies by examining citizens’ varying attitudes toward political corruption. We make an important theoretical distinction between perceptions of and tolerance for corruption, and argue that these different attitudes vary across individuals depending on whether they are political insiders or outsiders. We test our theory using Afrobarometer survey data from 18 sub-Saharan African countries and find that individuals included within clientelistic networks simultaneously perceive corruption as ubiquitous […]

Read More from “An Insider–Outsider Theory of Popular Tolerance for Corrupt Politicians .”

“Religious Institutions and Collective Action: The Catholic Church and Political Activism in Indigenous Chiapas and Yucatán.” Journal Article

Author(s): Christopher W. Hale

  Abstract Why do religious organizations facilitate secular political activism in some settings but not others? I contend that where religious institutions are characterized by decentralized local governance, they are more likely to facilitate political activism. Drawing on nine months of field research and 60 interviews, I conduct a qualitative comparison between the Mexican states of Chiapas and Yucatán. I argue Chiapas exhibits highly decentralized governance by the Catholic Church whereas Yucatán exhibits centralized clerical management. This difference accounts for […]

Read More from “Religious Institutions and Collective Action: The Catholic Church and Political Activism in Indigenous Chiapas and Yucatán.”

“Inside Irredentism: A Global Empirical Analysis.” Journal Article

Author(s): Christopher Hale (University of Alabama) and David Siroky (Arizona State University)

Abstract Although many countries have ethnic kin on the “wrong side” of their borders, few seek to annex foreign territories on the basis of ethnicity. This article examines why some states pursue irredentism, whereas others exhibit restraint. It focuses on the triadic structure of the kin group in the irredentist state, its coethnic enclave, and the host state, and provides new data on all actual and potential irredentist cases from 1946 to 2014. The results indicate that irredentism is more […]

Read More from “Inside Irredentism: A Global Empirical Analysis.”

“The Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing.” Journal Article

Author(s): Terry Royed, Robert Thomson, Elin Naurin, and Mark Ferguson

Abstract Why are some parties more likely than others to keep the promises they made during previous election campaigns? This study provides the first large-scale comparative analysis of pledge fulfillment with common definitions. We study the fulfillment of over 20,000 pledges made in 57 election campaigns in 12 countries, and our findings challenge the common view of parties as promise breakers. Many parties that enter government executives are highly likely to fulfill their pledges, and significantly more so than parties […]

Read More from “The Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing.”

“The Institutional Design of Eco-labels: Sponsorship Signals Rule Strength.” Journal Article

Author(s): Nicole Darnell, Hyunjung Ji, and Matthew Potoski

Abstract Eco-labels are designed to help consumers identify environmentally superior products and services, however, they are not all created equal. Some eco-labels have strong rules that promote environmental improvements, while others have weaker rules that permit free-riding. Since information about eco-label design and rule strength is typically not readily available at the point of purchase, consumers struggle to differentiate stronger eco-labels from weaker ones. We investigate whether eco-label sponsorship is a signal that can help consumers distinguish among eco-labels according […]

Read More from “The Institutional Design of Eco-labels: Sponsorship Signals Rule Strength.”

“All Are Not Created Equal: Assessing Local Governments’ Strategic Approaches Towards Sustainability.” Journal Article

Author(s): Hyunjung Ji and Nicole Darnall

Abstract While local governments often implement equivalent numbers of sustainability programmes, they likely utilize different strategies to design them. We posit that some local governments pursue more of an exploration strategy, by experimenting with a broad range of sustainability issues and policy instruments to address them, while others pursue a more exploitation strategy, by focusing on a limited range of sustainability issues and policy instruments. We assess these distinctions across 70 local governments and offer evidence that governments indeed vary […]

Read More from “All Are Not Created Equal: Assessing Local Governments’ Strategic Approaches Towards Sustainability.”